Store besparelser
Hurtig levering
Gemte
Log ind
0
Kurv
Bøger
Bestsellers
Kommer snart
Nyheder
Spil og hobby
Hjem
Kategorier
Bestsellers
Kommer snart
Nyheder
FAQ
Konto
Kontakt
Kurv
  1. Bog
  2. Jura, generelt
  3. Komparativ ret

Judicial Deference in International Adjudication

- A Comparative Analysis
Af: Johannes Hendrik Fahner Engelsk Paperback

Judicial Deference in International Adjudication

- A Comparative Analysis
Af: Johannes Hendrik Fahner Engelsk Paperback
Tjek vores konkurrenters priser
International courts and tribunals are increasingly asked to pass judgment on matters that are traditionally considered to fall within the domestic jurisdiction of States. Especially in the fields of human rights, investment, and trade law, international adjudicators commonly evaluate decisions of national authorities that have been made in the course of democratic procedures and public deliberation. A controversial question is whether international adjudicators should review such decisions de novo or show deference to domestic authorities. This book investigates how various international courts and tribunals have responded to this question. In addition to a comparative analysis, the book provides a normative argument, discussing whether different forms of deference are justified in international adjudication. It proposes a distinction between epistemic deference, which is based on the superior capacity of domestic authorities to make factual and technical assessments, and constitutional deference, which is based on the democratic legitimacy of domestic decision-making. The book concludes that epistemic deference is a prudent acknowledgement of the limited expertise of international adjudicators, whereas the case for constitutional deference depends on the relative power of the reviewing court vis-à-vis the domestic legal order.
Vis mere
Tjek vores konkurrenters priser
Normalpris
kr 526
Fragt: 39 kr
6 - 8 hverdage
20 kr
Pakkegebyr
God 4 anmeldelser på
Tjek vores konkurrenters priser
International courts and tribunals are increasingly asked to pass judgment on matters that are traditionally considered to fall within the domestic jurisdiction of States. Especially in the fields of human rights, investment, and trade law, international adjudicators commonly evaluate decisions of national authorities that have been made in the course of democratic procedures and public deliberation. A controversial question is whether international adjudicators should review such decisions de novo or show deference to domestic authorities. This book investigates how various international courts and tribunals have responded to this question. In addition to a comparative analysis, the book provides a normative argument, discussing whether different forms of deference are justified in international adjudication. It proposes a distinction between epistemic deference, which is based on the superior capacity of domestic authorities to make factual and technical assessments, and constitutional deference, which is based on the democratic legitimacy of domestic decision-making. The book concludes that epistemic deference is a prudent acknowledgement of the limited expertise of international adjudicators, whereas the case for constitutional deference depends on the relative power of the reviewing court vis-à-vis the domestic legal order.
Vis mere
Se mere i:
Produktdetaljer
Sprog: Engelsk
Sider: 312
ISBN-13: 9781509943463
Indbinding: Paperback
Udgave:
ISBN-10: 1509943463
Kategori: Komparativ ret
Udg. Dato: 24 feb 2022
Længde: 21mm
Bredde: 232mm
Højde: 156mm
Forlag: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
Oplagsdato: 24 feb 2022
Forfatter(e): Johannes Hendrik Fahner
Forfatter(e) Johannes Hendrik Fahner

Kategori Komparativ ret

ISBN-13 9781509943463

Sprog Engelsk

Indbinding Paperback

Sider 312

Udgave

Længde 21mm

Bredde 232mm

Højde 156mm

Udg. Dato 24 feb 2022

Oplagsdato 24 feb 2022

Forlag Bloomsbury Publishing PLC

Vi anbefaler også
Rosamunde Pilcher Vejen hjem
Vejen hjem
Rosamunde Pilcher
66 kr
Kategori sammenhænge